BobS is hosting a 
discussion on OC as that applies to the peculiarities of Texas.  Some good stuff in the comments, including this questionable analysis:
I think the principal factor in the principle in question is (or at least ought to be), does the action result in attraction of others to the principle being demonstrated for?
  IOW does what we do attract others in support of that thing or idea?  
There’s a strategy involved here which IMO ought to focus more on making
 uninvolved people aware of their shared loss of rights and less on our 
defiance of those rights being abused. 
  
To that end, I think the whole “long guns carried to someone’s place 
of public business” thing is overly confrontational – thus not 
attractive behavior to uninvolved fellow citizens – and overly done to 
boot.  The Starbucks type of gathering might still be be an excellent 
locale for an OC empty holster demonstration, but these need to be more 
than just a bunch of (mostly) guys wearing empty holsters (which is 
great political symbolism BTW).  There needs to be some actual political
 activism along with the eye-catching display of manly fashion 
accessories; signs, placards, maybe some brochures or flyers, perhaps an
 actual dedicated website in support of the political principle being 
demonstrated for. 
  
Toting an AR/AK around town is just threatening/annoying unless it is
 as an obvious prop in support of a political thesis (say, a rifle with a
 sign in support of 2A attached for instance). 
Here’s a specific suggestion: arrange a “activism date” with some 
friends at a public place where firearms aren’t expressly prohibited, 
print up a dozen flyers for each attendee to pass out in support of open
 carry legislation in Texas, everyone OC an empty holster (perhaps a few
 carry rifles/shotguns with signs attached that mention “human rights 
being denied to Texans”), solicit signatures for a petition to the 
legislature in support of OC legislation in the next session (doing so 
online thru the afore mentioned website would be best here) and invite 
the local media – being ready to play to their particular format 
interests especially. 
Admittedly, all of this requires a bit more effort than casually getting a cup of iffy coffee while scaring the white people proles other customers. 
Most of all, what is needed is a continuous sense of change in the 
activity/venue involved so as to imply a continuous advancement in the 
message being delivered – which in turn implies a reduction in 
resistance to the rights being exercised in a normal, regular fashion.  
No, the latter doesn’t logically follow the former – its politics; 
emotion and a personal feeling of common perception are the driving 
factors. 
 
In short, OC supporters need to become an actual political 
organization instead of a gaggle of well-intended but slightly scary 
individuals.  Toward that end, association with an established 
organization is the key.  There are a number of TSRA members here in the
 Tyler area (here’s one with pictures from one of their recent events; also here)
 that have staged events over this past summer.  Finding a Texas 
business to structure group formation around is what is desired; maybe these guys would be interested – I doubt I’m the only member who reads your blog.
The point at issue for me about Open Carry activism here in Texas is 
that there doesn’t seem to be that much outright objection to the idea of people carrying guns comfortably per se,
 but there is a lot of lethargy about building the legal and social 
hoops necessary for that change to happen.  And, Yes, the hoops are
 necessary – politics, remember?  Laws, courts, judges, district 
attorneys, cops – there are a lot of people who are already invested in 
the status quo ante, and people are generally lazy about doing anything different to what they are already comfortable/familiar with. 
  
So, we need to build an organization that provides the support 
infrastructure so our individual acts of 2A activism can be easily 
combined into a state-wide effort, that attracts general citizen notice 
and acceptance (if not outright support, at least no resistance) of the 
political principle being pursued. 
Prior to all that spontaneously coming into being, maybe just 
individuals going around openly wearing an empty holster all the time 
really is the simplest way to start.  Not sexy or confrontational, kinda
 sad really, and there’s the hook; “it’s sad so many Texans have there 
human rights so badly denied them, don’t you agree?”  If it’s not only
 about icky guns, people see opportunity for their pet interest too, and
 as long as they don’t oppose 2A rights/legislation we win.
 My objection to many previous OC events (notoriously at Starbucks) is that they appear to focus on the defiance of existing gun laws (or maybe just defiance to the 
existence of those laws) and not on gaining adherents to changing those laws.  If the existence of overly restrictive gun laws is your political point, giving the (however metaphorical) finger to those who abide by those laws doesn't seem the best possible means to actually changing (and ultimately doing away with) those laws.
 
1 comment:
Will,
Thanks for the comments and the links. It is a great discussion and I'm glad everyone is pitching in.
Here is a thought that I didn't think about until I read your closing comments.
on the defiance of existing gun laws (or maybe just defiance to the existence of those laws)
Is that necessarily a bad thing?
Honestly, we have so many overwhelmingly restrictive laws that people aren't aware of. Making them aware and opposed to those laws can be a good thing, right?
I'm minded of the Heinlein Book "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" -- where before the revolution, the Loonies had to be made aware of how much they didn't have, how tough the laws were, etc.
Post a Comment